Active Users:1436 Time:03/08/2026 06:05:34 PM
Cuendillar Armor Nargs Send a noteboard - 26/01/2011 06:26:03 PM
I am not interested in discussing whether it is worth doing. Not interested in discussing whether it is cost effective or not. Not worried about whether it takes too much time.

My soul purpose for this thread is to discuss whether it is possible to create 1 single set of cuendillar armor.

There are many types of armor to choose from. From breast plates to chain mail. Can you think of any types of armor that it would not be possible to turn to cuendillar? Why?

What method could be used to avoid the fusing of the components of the armor?
Reply to message
Cuendillar Armor - 26/01/2011 06:26:03 PM 1865 Views
We had a lengthy discussion of this on wotmania a few years ago... - 26/01/2011 06:46:27 PM 1318 Views
There are problems. - 26/01/2011 07:14:29 PM 1216 Views
Properties not understood... - 26/01/2011 08:15:48 PM 1306 Views
So, a thin layer of cuendillar, with lot of padding? *NM* - 26/01/2011 09:52:18 PM 463 Views
Re: There are problems. - 28/01/2011 06:31:19 PM 1186 Views
The spike was a later addition; the primary method of damage was blunt force trauma. *NM* - 28/01/2011 09:20:32 PM 450 Views
Plate armor is also a "late addition" - 03/02/2011 03:22:55 PM 945 Views
Who says it would transmit the shockwaves? As you note below it violates many laws of physics. *NM* - 02/02/2011 06:51:18 PM 476 Views
*shrug* - 02/02/2011 08:07:35 PM 1033 Views
There is no shockwave - 03/02/2011 03:29:21 PM 976 Views
Chain mail not difficult but long process. - 26/01/2011 08:21:04 PM 1477 Views
it's "sole" purpose *NM* - 26/01/2011 11:21:19 PM 485 Views
a cookie for you! cheers *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:38:46 PM 437 Views
well there seems to be more effective ways of going about making armor - 28/01/2011 06:54:37 PM 1059 Views
Reply in the wrong place. - 02/02/2011 06:52:26 PM 1072 Views
Awesome. So take your thoughts and apply them to the situation. - 02/02/2011 08:10:05 PM 1030 Views
I know, but it's more fun to break physics with magic *NM* - 02/02/2011 09:27:36 PM 487 Views
Re: I know, but it's more fun to break physics with magic - 04/02/2011 02:16:42 PM 1015 Views

Reply to Message