Active Users:135 Time:16/04/2024 06:43:43 PM
Re: Who said that she had to have a motivation? malekithe Send a noteboard - 06/02/2011 08:30:38 AM
For (literally) years, people have been dancing around this idea. "What motivation would she have?" Murders do not require a motivation. They require opportunity and means. We know full well that Graendal has the means. She's an extremely strong channeler who knows exactly how to do whatever she wants in the (literal) blink of an eye.

As per opportunity, there have been many theories back and forth for why she was in Caemlyn. Some say to go through Rhavin's stash of goodies. That's a distinct possibiliy, seeing as how she did that with Sammael. But you know what's far more likely? She was already in Caemlyn. Remember that Lanfear, Graendal, Rhavin, and Sammael had a plan to lure Rand to attack Sammael in Illian. They had been goading him for some time. The plan for for Rand to attack Sammael in Illian, and Rhavin, Graendal, and Lanfear would join in the attack and it would be over.

From their point of view Lanfear was a no show. Graendal had every reason to be in the Caemlyn palace for that plot alone. She had to know that the battle between Rand & Rhavin didn't go well. It was time for her to get out of Dodge. She walks out. Literally the only person we know for sure who would recognize her is Asmodean. At that point, we can't even be sure if Rand would recognize her (although I suspect that he would). No Aes Sedai would....even if there were any in the Palace (which were were not). It was just Asmodean's very bad luck to stumble across her while she's trying to escape. Not only does he see/recognize her, but she also believes him a traitor. Click...click...boom.

Asmodean's toast; Graendal gets out of the palace with no one the wiser.

I don't understand what's so hard about this thought process.

~Jeordam


Look, I could write a story about how Laras killed Asmodean.. but that doesnt make it an interesting exciting story. So Granedal killed Asmodean, and such and such is the reason. THAT doesnt make it an interesting read.

It's just NOT INTERESTING that Graendal is the killer. It might have been any Forsaken, BA, Shadowspawn or the pool cleaner as far as I'm concerned because the 'story' behind this great mystery is no story at all!

Isn't intrigue one of the main reasons we read these books? It's just a poorly compelling reason to accept Graendal.
Reply to message
Graendal's motivation - 04/02/2011 07:26:08 AM 1517 Views
Re: Graendal's motivation - 04/02/2011 10:28:27 AM 1009 Views
Re: Graendal's motivation - 04/02/2011 12:10:19 PM 654 Views
Maybe she thought to rifle through the sa'/ter'/angreal cache that Rand and co got from Rhuidean ... - 04/02/2011 03:30:28 PM 586 Views
Yes, which could be why she was in a random hallway. - 04/02/2011 04:48:05 PM 560 Views
I'll give you part of that.... - 04/02/2011 10:13:42 PM 633 Views
Re: I'll give you part of that.... - 04/02/2011 11:52:50 PM 549 Views
Except for the fact.... - 04/02/2011 10:11:23 PM 626 Views
Answers so far.. - 04/02/2011 06:05:04 PM 654 Views
Re: Answers so far.. - 04/02/2011 07:13:18 PM 1176 Views
Re: Answers so far.. - 05/02/2011 03:11:34 PM 623 Views
Who said that she had to have a motivation? - 04/02/2011 10:08:45 PM 678 Views
Re: Who said that she had to have a motivation? - 05/02/2011 04:55:40 AM 565 Views
Re: Who said that she had to have a motivation? - 06/02/2011 08:30:38 AM 565 Views
Re: Graendal's motivation - 04/02/2011 10:10:16 PM 735 Views
I still don't think she killed him. *NM* - 05/02/2011 02:08:20 AM 302 Views
She had to know what was going on and fast.... - 05/02/2011 02:28:11 AM 876 Views
As always very well summed up! *NM* - 05/02/2011 04:11:08 PM 300 Views
Re: She had to know what was going on and fast.... - 06/02/2011 08:36:22 AM 809 Views
I think that's the point - 06/02/2011 06:19:04 PM 560 Views
self defense - 05/02/2011 04:53:12 AM 665 Views
Re: self defense - 06/02/2011 08:39:56 AM 576 Views
I've struggled with this too. My thoughts so far... - 07/02/2011 05:07:45 AM 582 Views
Re: No disguise because - 07/02/2011 12:10:34 PM 630 Views
Re: No disguise because - 09/02/2011 11:10:09 PM 616 Views

Reply to Message