Active Users:210 Time:30/04/2024 12:40:17 PM
I thought Morgase intended to not involve the Whitecloacks at all when she went to Amadicia Zeratul Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 02:08:40 PM
She was certainly shocked when Niall came to her and offered her Whitecloacks troops and didn't react like this was expected as part of her plan. She was angry that Tallanvor and Gill had let Niall come to her and threw a tantrum at first.

Besides, even though Niall is known as a politician, not a fanatic, expecting him to help a Tower trained woman in blatant disregard with the Whitecloack scriptures and customs is quite a leap. But even if that's been overcome somehow, the Whitecloacks would have never accepted Elayne - an actual channeller, trained by Aes Sedai, and strong enough to make Accepted in less than an year, as a heir of the Lion Throne. So If Morgase intended to preserve Elayne's claim, getting the Whitecloacks backing was a terrible idea.
Reply to message
What do you think Morgase should have done? - 16/05/2011 08:42:20 PM 1975 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 18/05/2011 04:18:20 AM 832 Views
Morgase and Cairhien - 18/05/2011 10:08:50 AM 786 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 18/05/2011 12:32:30 PM 1082 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 18/05/2011 04:40:04 PM 769 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 20/05/2011 09:56:59 AM 1018 Views
Died in a hole - 18/05/2011 07:36:42 PM 745 Views
Well, Amador wouldn't have been my first choice. - 19/05/2011 08:52:46 AM 908 Views
Re: Well, Amador wouldn't have been my first choice. - 19/05/2011 12:43:21 PM 865 Views
I thought Morgase intended to not involve the Whitecloacks at all when she went to Amadicia - 19/05/2011 02:08:40 PM 742 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 19/05/2011 02:19:24 PM 773 Views
Gone to the Tower. - 20/05/2011 11:01:30 PM 812 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 23/05/2011 04:29:18 AM 794 Views
right *NM* - 04/06/2011 02:32:14 AM 361 Views

Reply to Message