Active Users:337 Time:17/05/2024 06:39:03 PM
I thought Morgase intended to not involve the Whitecloacks at all when she went to Amadicia Zeratul Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 02:08:40 PM
She was certainly shocked when Niall came to her and offered her Whitecloacks troops and didn't react like this was expected as part of her plan. She was angry that Tallanvor and Gill had let Niall come to her and threw a tantrum at first.

Besides, even though Niall is known as a politician, not a fanatic, expecting him to help a Tower trained woman in blatant disregard with the Whitecloack scriptures and customs is quite a leap. But even if that's been overcome somehow, the Whitecloacks would have never accepted Elayne - an actual channeller, trained by Aes Sedai, and strong enough to make Accepted in less than an year, as a heir of the Lion Throne. So If Morgase intended to preserve Elayne's claim, getting the Whitecloacks backing was a terrible idea.
Reply to message
What do you think Morgase should have done? - 16/05/2011 08:42:20 PM 1978 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 18/05/2011 04:18:20 AM 836 Views
Morgase and Cairhien - 18/05/2011 10:08:50 AM 790 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 18/05/2011 12:32:30 PM 1090 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 18/05/2011 04:40:04 PM 776 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 20/05/2011 09:56:59 AM 1025 Views
Died in a hole - 18/05/2011 07:36:42 PM 748 Views
Well, Amador wouldn't have been my first choice. - 19/05/2011 08:52:46 AM 912 Views
Re: Well, Amador wouldn't have been my first choice. - 19/05/2011 12:43:21 PM 868 Views
I thought Morgase intended to not involve the Whitecloacks at all when she went to Amadicia - 19/05/2011 02:08:40 PM 744 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 19/05/2011 02:19:24 PM 775 Views
Gone to the Tower. - 20/05/2011 11:01:30 PM 813 Views
Re: What do you think Morgase should have done? - 23/05/2011 04:29:18 AM 796 Views
right *NM* - 04/06/2011 02:32:14 AM 362 Views

Reply to Message