Active Users:356 Time:25/04/2024 07:34:20 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Unbreakable and unbendable not the same thing aerocontrols Send a noteboard - 17/02/2012 03:12:57 PM
Heartstone is indestructible from the moment it exists. If you hit it a thousand more times with a hammer, it doesn't somehow become MORE indestructible.


I have no idea why that popped into my head just now, but it's always bugged me.


Take a heartstone rod, 50 feet long, and set it in a building, with 40 feet of it sticking out. Now, hang 500 lbs off off of the end of it, and (perhaps) the end will bend down 3 inches. Over time, the bar gets stronger (less ductile, but no more brittle, since it's unbreakable) and finally straightens out on its own.

/No, I don't actually think Robert Jordan had this in mind when he decided to give the material that ridiculous quality, but still, the statement could be true in the way that I've said.
Hollywood has the best moral compass, because it has compassion.
Reply to message
Cuendillar: All force directed against simply "makes it stronger" What? Bull. beetnemesis - 14/02/2012 07:56:14 PM 1143 Views
Yeah, an absolute is an absolute. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 08:00:56 PM 296 Views
Well not absolute... large doses of "evil" over an extended period of time makes it crumble *NM* Iceman - 14/02/2012 09:51:30 PM 295 Views
obviously Rand's been going about htis all wrong, then LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 10:08:48 PM 743 Views
Depends on your definition of "indestructible", I guess kHz1000 - 15/02/2012 08:41:02 AM 798 Views
Unbreakable and unbendable not the same thing aerocontrols - 17/02/2012 03:12:57 PM 910 Views
And Praziquantel - 17/02/2012 04:28:36 PM 669 Views
Re: Cuendillar: All force directed against simply "makes it stronger" What? Bull. Gerbeaud - 17/02/2012 04:32:51 PM 556 Views
Simple answer to this is the conservation of energy. Onarishma - 23/02/2012 07:09:19 PM 632 Views
Yeah, I like this one the best Marshall - 16/03/2012 06:49:11 PM 679 Views
Well, all that energy of the eternally burning sun has to go somewhere *NM* Lohikaarme - 16/03/2012 11:21:36 PM 291 Views
I wonder what causes the sun to refuel though? *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 17/03/2012 01:42:55 AM 280 Views
Theoretically the Sun will burn out darius_sedai - 17/03/2012 04:38:35 PM 642 Views
Not in WoT it won't. Fanatic-Templar - 17/03/2012 05:18:24 PM 616 Views
All that means is time doesn't move forward in WOT meaning there is no change darius_sedai - 17/03/2012 07:36:45 PM 650 Views
How so? Fanatic-Templar - 18/03/2012 04:08:20 AM 601 Views
The link I attached discussed how our sun burns and it's estimated life time darius_sedai - 18/03/2012 02:07:06 PM 595 Views
Yes, speaking of that link... Fanatic-Templar - 18/03/2012 05:59:31 PM 572 Views
Keep reading darius_sedai - 18/03/2012 11:13:16 PM 528 Views
I don't get what you're trying to say. Fanatic-Templar - 19/03/2012 01:48:46 AM 569 Views
Doesn't matter ... As you said earlier it's an irrelevant point anyway. darius_sedai - 19/03/2012 03:26:04 AM 501 Views
As you wish. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 19/03/2012 03:27:39 AM 231 Views
Re: I wonder what causes the sun to refuel though? Sidious - 17/03/2012 07:39:30 PM 611 Views
Yeah, probably. Fanatic-Templar - 18/03/2012 04:10:12 AM 517 Views
except energy doesn't usually convert to matter, does it? LadyLorraine - 17/03/2012 07:48:24 AM 727 Views
This is what best explains everything... DomA - 17/03/2012 02:53:02 PM 636 Views
Hmmm.... fionwe1987 - 17/03/2012 03:28:24 PM 697 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes