Active Users:648 Time:03/08/2025 02:57:06 PM
Not quite... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 25/03/2012 08:34:49 PM
But that has absolutely no legal bearing whatsoever. Did the United States cede New Orleans when they failed The city? You could argue this point all over the place, but it's ultimately the legal side that matters here.

Andor is a feudal society, and the Queen had authority over the Two Rivers because she promised to protect it. She failed, she no longer has authority.

As Elayne says in ToM, any Andoran soldiers and tax collectors would have been rebuffed by the TR folk in the past. They obviously didn;t expect Trollocs, and didn't consider themselves Andoran citizens. They were basically in a passive rebellion against Andor for hundreds of years, and Andor let that pass.

The feudal concept goes both ways. You can demand protection if you pay the lords taxes and agree for your men to be levied when he leaves them. The TR people didn't want any of the latter. I don't see where they can claim the right to secede on the basis of an invasion no one could have possibly foreseen, and which Andoran soldiers would have arrived in force to defeat the moment they heard of it.

After all, if the TR folk were loyal Andoran citizens, why in the world didn't they write to Morghase the moment Trollocs poked their heads into Andor in tEotW? Why not warn her some might head her way? Why, a "loyal TR man" even visited Queen Morghase and despite her just treatment of him, said nothing to her about a threat to her kingdom!
Reply to message
Bad Elayne! No biscuit! - 18/02/2012 10:13:54 PM 2372 Views
You are assigning your 21st century view onto people with totally different circumstances - 18/02/2012 11:33:56 PM 1073 Views
The Queen of Andor lost all authority over the Two Rivers when she failed to protect it. *NM* - 25/03/2012 02:53:23 PM 568 Views
Which is why they elected their own lord - 25/03/2012 06:25:31 PM 988 Views
Feudal law. - 25/03/2012 07:52:25 PM 1046 Views
Not quite... - 25/03/2012 08:34:49 PM 964 Views
All that, PLUS.. - 25/03/2012 09:55:26 PM 1185 Views
Re: Not quite... - 26/03/2012 03:53:46 PM 1340 Views
And she has not tried to exert authority over them - 25/03/2012 10:33:44 PM 1057 Views
Yes, absolutely. I remember saying this back when I first read the book. - 18/02/2012 11:44:19 PM 1372 Views
No, you are not. - 19/02/2012 03:44:04 AM 1091 Views
Re: Yes, absolutely. I remember saying this back when I first read the book. - 20/02/2012 03:11:14 AM 1462 Views
Re: Yes, absolutely. I remember saying this back when I first read the book. - 20/02/2012 06:22:21 AM 988 Views
Failed to click "Edit" instead of "Reply". - 20/02/2012 06:23:18 AM 1088 Views
"Damn sister married the Pope instead of my chosen Lord Ohsoimportant" - 25/03/2012 03:50:06 PM 1129 Views
Nobles and Ishara's blood - 03/04/2012 02:59:03 PM 1033 Views
Okay, I admit it, there is no way I am reading such a long post about Elayne..... - 19/02/2012 08:14:53 PM 1042 Views
it was a bear to read but enlightening none the less. *NM* - 20/02/2012 08:49:35 AM 590 Views
The Caraline treatment. - 25/03/2012 02:41:12 PM 1011 Views
Do you Colavaer Saighan? I don't recall Caraline having her lands and titles stripped - 25/03/2012 10:44:57 PM 1051 Views
Yes, sorry about the mixup. Names sound the same. *NM* - 26/03/2012 02:52:18 PM 696 Views
Re: Bad Elayne! No biscuit! - 27/03/2012 07:39:05 PM 983 Views
Perrin is Rand's servant, so TR belongs to Rand *NM* *NM* - 12/04/2012 07:30:46 PM 769 Views

Reply to Message