Active Users:459 Time:31/07/2026 12:43:58 AM
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. Datakim Send a noteboard - 20/06/2012 06:57:50 PM
You only addressed half the argument. That being said, I think the stone is more symbolic than anything else, anyway.


Err what? You mean the idea that DO can only control a limited amount of things at once? That would not prevent the DO from influencing the WT, then the BT then Caemlyn and so on, depending on where his influence would do the most harm. Having SG-stone in all major cities would allow the DO to choose which place to influence, and change the location of that influence at will. Right now for example, the White Tower would be a far better place for the DO to focus his attention on than the Black Tower.

You are probably right about it being just symbolic though. It seems unlikely that Sanderson would have told us if its going to play a role in the coming book.
Reply to message
So apparently the palace at the Black Tower is made of Shayol Ghul stone... - 23/05/2012 12:57:37 AM 2560 Views
I saw that too, but how is that even possible?? - 23/05/2012 03:02:57 AM 1554 Views
Not the palace... - 23/05/2012 03:32:59 AM 1530 Views
That is good logic, but the flip side is: Why would RJ bother to specify that if it were minutiae? - 23/05/2012 11:22:24 AM 1381 Views
Re: Not the palace... - 23/05/2012 02:43:28 PM 1294 Views
Re: Not the palace... - 23/05/2012 08:30:46 PM 1369 Views
My initial thoughts on it had to do with the properties of SG. - 23/05/2012 10:58:21 PM 1241 Views
Taim always a darkfriend? - 28/05/2012 01:17:34 AM 1430 Views
If SG rocks have special properties... - 28/05/2012 01:28:28 AM 1191 Views
Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 18/06/2012 12:31:48 PM 1128 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 19/06/2012 05:42:21 AM 1263 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 19/06/2012 06:51:02 AM 1109 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 20/06/2012 06:57:50 PM 1164 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 24/06/2012 10:34:14 AM 1124 Views

Reply to Message