Active Users:429 Time:17/09/2025 11:20:05 PM
That's ... actually not entirely correct. Nate Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM
RJ used contractions in dialogue, but not in the narrative. He also had characters like Moiraine who never used contractions in the dialogue. Brandon uses them wherever. And yes, writing style is a huge part of why I love WoT.


Sanderson definitely uses them more, but Jordan did use them in the narrative sometimes, particularly "he'd" and "she'd". Just as a random example from the first book, Chapter 10, in the narrative. "... he cleared his throat, then shot Rand the same warning frown he'd given Mat"

Though, why is it all right for the dialogue to have some concessions to modern style, but not the narrative?
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1656 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 402 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 830 Views
Tell me, honestly. - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1359 Views
Contractions - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 1011 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 1054 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 372 Views
Oh Terez... - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 949 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 404 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 770 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 1056 Views
I did notice that on my reread - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 878 Views
It's how they're used and by whom - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 1121 Views
Oh Cannoli, - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 963 Views

Reply to Message