Active Users:3762 Time:02/08/2026 03:45:30 AM
I did notice that on my reread Terez Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM
Just citing Brandon because he mentions it all the time, and generally he's correct. I think RJ used narrative contractions slightly more often in the early books, but even then, not very often. My best guess is that he did it instinctively, and realized somewhere down the road that it was an aspect of his style, at which point it became essentially a rule. As for whether it's 'all right' to use any particular narrative style in general, there are a lot of differing perspectives in that regard, but RJ's narrative style is part of the feel of WoT. Brandon doesn't feel comfortable trying to imitate it, and I get that, but it does make a difference to some of us, and sometimes it seems to us that the differences are simple and not too difficult to address.
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1841 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 491 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 1019 Views
Tell me, honestly. - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1591 Views
Contractions - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 1204 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 1263 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 475 Views
Oh Terez... - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 1145 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 502 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 958 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 1288 Views
I did notice that on my reread - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 1085 Views
It's how they're used and by whom - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 1306 Views
Oh Cannoli, - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 1163 Views

Reply to Message