Active Users:3055 Time:03/05/2026 01:36:17 PM
That's ... actually not entirely correct. Nate Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM
RJ used contractions in dialogue, but not in the narrative. He also had characters like Moiraine who never used contractions in the dialogue. Brandon uses them wherever. And yes, writing style is a huge part of why I love WoT.


Sanderson definitely uses them more, but Jordan did use them in the narrative sometimes, particularly "he'd" and "she'd". Just as a random example from the first book, Chapter 10, in the narrative. "... he cleared his throat, then shot Rand the same warning frown he'd given Mat"

Though, why is it all right for the dialogue to have some concessions to modern style, but not the narrative?
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1797 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 468 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 965 Views
Tell me, honestly. - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1536 Views
Contractions - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 1160 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 1221 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 448 Views
Oh Terez... - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 1101 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 474 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 919 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 1241 Views
I did notice that on my reread - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 1036 Views
It's how they're used and by whom - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 1262 Views
Oh Cannoli, - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 1120 Views

Reply to Message