Active Users:464 Time:01/11/2026 02:46:20 AM
Some proof against your idea... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 01/10/2009 03:37:48 AM
I think one scene from KoD kind of disproves what you are suggesting. Nynaeve notices mixed links that are channeling giant balls of fire to burn Trollocs. She states that the intensity of the flames was too high for it to be from saidar (that she can see) alone. The implication is that saidin was used as well.

Now, if what you say is true, Nynaeve would not have said "saidar alone". Why imply the presence of another power if the link can enhance saidar? Why not say "unenhanced saidar"?

I agree with you on one thing, though. While each channeler in a link will be channeling a small amount of the Power at least, the leader can make them use different amounts, and not use any of their power at all if they so choose.
Reply to message
Male/Female circles - 25/09/2009 09:33:38 PM 1188 Views
Yes; somewhat. - 25/09/2009 10:57:35 PM 876 Views
Re: Yes; somewhat. - 26/09/2009 06:19:45 AM 777 Views
Why would saidar surprise him? - 26/09/2009 03:40:23 PM 859 Views
Re: Why would saidar surprise him? - 26/09/2009 06:34:04 PM 812 Views
He thought they were Aes Sedai who could not channel? - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM 764 Views
He did not know they were Aes Sedai until after the mixed weave struck his warding. - 26/09/2009 10:13:10 PM 741 Views
You're right. I misremembered. *NM* - 26/09/2009 10:17:22 PM 328 Views
right... - 26/09/2009 02:56:26 PM 799 Views
Re: right... - 26/09/2009 07:49:21 PM 828 Views
I think Lanfear clears this up... - 27/09/2009 05:19:37 AM 828 Views
But he did see the weaves - 29/09/2009 03:38:10 PM 778 Views
Agreed, plus some numbers ... - 28/09/2009 07:50:54 PM 759 Views
I don't agree with some of this - 28/09/2009 09:37:13 PM 775 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 02:39:46 PM 789 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 06:07:56 PM 771 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 07:00:28 PM 750 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 08:25:19 PM 909 Views
I understand what you're saying ... - 30/09/2009 04:04:17 PM 783 Views
Indeed - 30/09/2009 04:32:37 PM 747 Views
Re: Indeed - 30/09/2009 07:05:13 PM 770 Views
Some proof against your idea... - 01/10/2009 03:37:48 AM 791 Views
Nice, thanks ... - 01/10/2009 02:00:24 PM 760 Views
Re: Nice, thanks ... - 01/10/2009 04:58:02 PM 807 Views
That makes more sense, to me ... - 01/10/2009 06:44:44 PM 857 Views
Re: That makes more sense, to me ... - 03/10/2009 06:53:45 AM 853 Views
Re: Male/Female circles - 27/09/2009 02:19:31 PM 750 Views
Re: Male/Female circles - 28/09/2009 03:58:15 PM 763 Views

Reply to Message