Active Users:250 Time:29/03/2024 11:52:47 AM
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM

View original post
I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1525 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 885 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 376 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 411 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 383 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 380 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1028 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 944 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 498 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 714 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 854 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 836 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 698 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 749 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 885 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 393 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 406 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 448 Views

Reply to Message