Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM*
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM
View original post
I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.
I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon?
- 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM
2069 Views
Why does anybody care?
- 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM
1719 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM*
- 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM
940 Views
See how easy that is to say? You should have that attitude over in Mafia... *NM*
- 20/01/2014 04:02:06 AM
695 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no.
- 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM
1415 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy.....
- 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM
1460 Views
They're not the books RJ would've written but striking them from canon is ridiculous at every level *NM*
- 28/01/2014 07:13:46 AM
688 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd.
- 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM
1367 Views