Active Users:2594 Time:19/06/2026 02:49:01 AM
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* aragornital Send a noteboard - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM
Chii? Chiiii!
This message last edited by aragornital on 28/01/2014 at 05:46:40 AM
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 2021 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1413 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 771 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 720 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 724 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 701 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1661 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1673 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 910 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1214 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1374 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1341 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1228 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1360 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1416 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 674 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 704 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 752 Views

Reply to Message