Active Users:184 Time:17/05/2024 11:27:42 AM
And here we have more proof that the Strength list is either flawed, or not a linear distributition Shannow Send a noteboard - 10/09/2015 09:22:07 AM

Ah, I just love how the puzzle is coming together. This excerpt has given us yet more ammunition showing that the Strength list has major flaws in it, or else that the distribution is most certainly not uniform from one level to the next.

This evidence comes from the Siuan entry in the Amyrlin list. It gives us both Siuan's pre and post stilling strength. Before stilling, she was a level 13, and after stilling, a level 35.

Now, if you plot that on a uniformly distributed 72 point list, then it means her post stilling strength was 64% of her former strength. Quite simply, this directly contradicts Siuan's own comments on the matter.

In the books, Siuan wishes that she could get back to at least half her former strength. Clearly, Siuan is currently well below half her former strength, which makes it impossible for her to be at level 35 on a uniformly distributed strength list.

This is just another nail in the coffin of those who try to argue that the list somehow gives us an indication of the comparative strength of various characters. As if we needed any more convincing other than the absurdity of Elaida supposedly being at 83% of Lanfear's strength, which would be the implication if she was indeed 60/72 as strong as Lanfear.



















>

This message last edited by Shannow on 10/09/2015 at 09:26:34 AM
Reply to message
When Elaida was made to feel like a Novice and other stories of Amyrlin Seats (SPOILERS) - 10/09/2015 03:42:07 AM 983 Views
And here we have more proof that the Strength list is either flawed, or not a linear distributition - 10/09/2015 09:22:07 AM 734 Views
Did you not read the strength in the OP article? - 10/09/2015 02:52:33 PM 776 Views
DP - 10/09/2015 09:22:22 AM 564 Views

Reply to Message