Active Users:642 Time:21/12/2025 12:30:24 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1569 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 940 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 933 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1049 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 847 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 978 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 857 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1099 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 968 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 935 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1003 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 890 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 842 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 885 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1222 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1100 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1033 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 886 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1102 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1063 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 418 Views

Reply to Message