Active Users:604 Time:03/08/2025 08:37:25 AM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1482 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 845 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 833 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 938 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 767 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 866 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 745 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 976 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 871 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 832 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 909 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 791 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 765 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 798 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1114 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1016 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 927 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 804 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 992 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 994 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 385 Views

Reply to Message