Active Users:440 Time:04/08/2026 08:52:37 AM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much ßelals Girl Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM

View original post

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?


Not "problematic," I said the lack of gay men in the story was inconsistent with the in-universe view of open homosexuality. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but...who cares what you think?

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1727 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1088 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1101 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1169 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 963 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1107 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 986 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1486 Views
It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light - 21/10/2016 11:04:08 AM 1109 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1090 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1073 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1135 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 1016 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 972 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 1006 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1356 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1227 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1179 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 1000 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1271 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1199 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 481 Views

Reply to Message