Active Users:889 Time:05/05/2026 09:54:02 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much ßelals Girl Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM

View original post

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?


Not "problematic," I said the lack of gay men in the story was inconsistent with the in-universe view of open homosexuality. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but...who cares what you think?

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1679 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1028 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1036 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1131 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 913 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1062 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 934 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1240 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1049 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1023 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1079 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 974 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 930 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 960 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1316 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1185 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1140 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 963 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1191 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1144 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 454 Views

Reply to Message