Active Users:2547 Time:24/10/2026 02:56:38 PM
Report: tGS concentrates on Secondary plotlines, it seems. (No Spoilers) fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 19/10/2009 03:44:44 PM
According to Pat of Pat's Fantasy Hotlist. He said in Westeros' Literature forum that tGS was the WoT equivalent of Erikson's Toll the Hounds, in that there was good stuff in the book, but 2/3rds of it concentrated on secondary plot lines.

Given that the book focuses on Egwene and Rand, I wonder what he means. Does he consider Graendal, Aviendha, the BA hunters, Elaida and Siuan to be secondary characters whose stories are unimportant for TG?

Also, apprently, Sanderson cannot do Mat very well.

PS: Posted this separately since this is not a review and does not contain any actual spoilers.
Reply to message
Report: tGS concentrates on Secondary plotlines, it seems. (No Spoilers) - 19/10/2009 03:44:44 PM 1864 Views
Odd. - 19/10/2009 04:06:29 PM 1021 Views
I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 04:10:59 PM 1001 Views
I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:16:14 PM 930 Views
Re: I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:40:20 PM 911 Views
Done. *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:44:00 PM 395 Views
Thanks! *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:56:58 PM 344 Views
Me too? - 20/10/2009 05:14:43 AM 821 Views
Could you NB me a copy as well? I'm a big no-spoilers kinda guy - 19/10/2009 08:07:19 PM 782 Views
Please send me the review, as well. - 19/10/2009 07:34:00 PM 827 Views
I also like NB messages - 19/10/2009 08:03:21 PM 752 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 11:25:11 PM 788 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 20/10/2009 12:19:06 AM 906 Views
Odd - 19/10/2009 06:17:09 PM 959 Views
Please NB me too? - 20/10/2009 07:29:42 PM 896 Views
WHAT!? - 19/10/2009 11:27:52 PM 900 Views
I hope he writes Mat well for fairly obvious reasons *NM* - 20/10/2009 03:47:05 AM 414 Views
Can't do Mat WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!? - 20/10/2009 07:24:24 PM 852 Views
Nonsense in hindsight. *NM* - 03/11/2009 10:51:11 AM 352 Views
Yup. - 03/11/2009 05:34:26 PM 786 Views

Reply to Message