Active Users:1318 Time:22/07/2026 01:38:06 AM
Nonsense in hindsight. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 03/11/2009 10:51:11 AM
According to Pat of Pat's Fantasy Hotlist. He said in Westeros' Literature forum that tGS was the WoT equivalent of Erikson's Toll the Hounds, in that there was good stuff in the book, but 2/3rds of it concentrated on secondary plot lines.

Given that the book focuses on Egwene and Rand, I wonder what he means. Does he consider Graendal, Aviendha, the BA hunters, Elaida and Siuan to be secondary characters whose stories are unimportant for TG?

Also, apprently, Sanderson cannot do Mat very well.

PS: Posted this separately since this is not a review and does not contain any actual spoilers.
Reply to message
Report: tGS concentrates on Secondary plotlines, it seems. (No Spoilers) - 19/10/2009 03:44:44 PM 1822 Views
Odd. - 19/10/2009 04:06:29 PM 978 Views
I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 04:10:59 PM 948 Views
I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:16:14 PM 886 Views
Re: I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:40:20 PM 867 Views
Done. *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:44:00 PM 373 Views
Thanks! *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:56:58 PM 322 Views
Me too? - 20/10/2009 05:14:43 AM 777 Views
Could you NB me a copy as well? I'm a big no-spoilers kinda guy - 19/10/2009 08:07:19 PM 745 Views
Please send me the review, as well. - 19/10/2009 07:34:00 PM 772 Views
I also like NB messages - 19/10/2009 08:03:21 PM 712 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 11:25:11 PM 729 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 20/10/2009 12:19:06 AM 849 Views
Odd - 19/10/2009 06:17:09 PM 921 Views
Please NB me too? - 20/10/2009 07:29:42 PM 822 Views
WHAT!? - 19/10/2009 11:27:52 PM 843 Views
I hope he writes Mat well for fairly obvious reasons *NM* - 20/10/2009 03:47:05 AM 396 Views
Can't do Mat WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!? - 20/10/2009 07:24:24 PM 806 Views
Nonsense in hindsight. *NM* - 03/11/2009 10:51:11 AM 329 Views
Yup. - 03/11/2009 05:34:26 PM 736 Views

Reply to Message