Active Users:626 Time:03/08/2025 02:05:11 AM
Agreed Simon Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.


And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.

Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1562 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 821 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 776 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 758 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 950 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 784 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 817 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 773 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 304 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 720 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 290 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 761 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 711 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 685 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 701 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 651 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 597 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 717 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 812 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 656 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 646 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 645 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 747 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 748 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 638 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 665 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 743 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 743 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 936 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 614 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 703 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 664 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 653 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 282 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 648 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 666 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 643 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 640 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 588 Views

Reply to Message