The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.
And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
- 1552 Views
Yes, but not me
30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
- 810 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
- 936 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
- 769 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
- 803 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
- 759 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
- 299 Views
For what?
31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
- 750 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
- 304 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
- 698 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
- 677 Views

I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
- 301 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
- 308 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
- 800 Views
You dont really get it.
31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
- 644 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
- 737 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
- 730 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
- 627 Views
That's complete hogwash.
31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
- 652 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
- 692 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
- 994 Views
Well that was rather silly.
31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
- 602 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
- 594 Views
Several valid points...
31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
- 691 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
- 690 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
- 651 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
- 641 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
- 635 Views
Due to their conditioning.
31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
- 655 Views
She will
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
- 296 Views

Agreed
31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
- 628 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
- 703 Views