Active Users:626 Time:03/08/2025 02:08:23 AM
Your point has some validity for the actual Seanchan damane. Legolas Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 06:43:40 PM

All the angoy Egwene felt at the hands of Seanchan could be replaced by her angoy at trying to run away from WT, getting caught and beaten by MoN, being sent to a farm for hard labor, being shielded or forkrooted to control her channeling, ...

Being a perfect damane will be replaced by being a prefect AS. The training method of Seanchan is not much different from the trainning method of the WT. Both are brainwashed to believe they are doing the greater good, no matter what the outsiders say to them.


Though even there you exaggerate by equating the two, as damane are treated more like animals than anything else - remember the thing with the titles, "der'suldam" in analogy with "der'toraken" and the other officers in charge of animals. The Tower treatment of novices and Accepted is harsh at times, but honestly not even in the same league, excepting of course what they do to Egwene, under rather special circumstances. Aiel treatment of Wise One apprentices is still harsher, but also not remotely as bad - hard, but fair.

But when you get to the topic of leashed marath'damane, the captured Aes Sedai and Sea Folk and others, including Egwene in The Great Hunt, the comparison becomes completely absurd. There we are talking about intentionally breaking people, abusing and harrassing and torturing them until they break. TGH Egwene admittedly hadn't had her Aiel training yet, and was not yet resistant to pain like she is in KoD and tGS, but you'll note that it's not the pain itself that is most vivid in her nightmares and memories, but the being broken, the part of her that *wants* to please the suldam.
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1563 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 822 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 776 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 758 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 950 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 785 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 817 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 773 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 305 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 720 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 290 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 762 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 711 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 685 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 701 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 651 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 597 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 718 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 812 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 656 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 646 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 645 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 747 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 748 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 639 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 666 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 743 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 743 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 936 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 614 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 704 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT - 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM 703 Views
Your point has some validity for the actual Seanchan damane. - 31/10/2009 06:43:40 PM 725 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 664 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 653 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 283 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 648 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 666 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 643 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 640 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 589 Views

Reply to Message