The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.
And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1762 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
1023 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
1160 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
1001 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
1054 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
997 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
405 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
993 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
411 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
918 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
880 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
880 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
412 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
415 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
1003 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
868 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
989 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
963 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
877 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
916 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
930 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
1204 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
831 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
832 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
930 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
911 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
853 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
885 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
865 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
879 Views
She will
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
416 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
416 Views
Agreed
- 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
854 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
940 Views
