Active Users:322 Time:14/05/2024 11:13:27 PM
Re: I'm 99% sure that was Mesaana. (Sheriam stated specifically that it wasn't Halima) StinkerSkunk Send a noteboard - 01/11/2009 10:44:07 PM
Well, it's obvious that it wasn't Halima. Sheriam's visitor was a saidar channeler. But Sheriam noted her exceptional strength in the OP, so it maybe was Cyndane.
Reply to message
Forsaken update... who's dead and who's not - 01/11/2009 06:49:13 PM 1337 Views
Graendal - 01/11/2009 08:23:31 PM 792 Views
Re: Graendal - 01/11/2009 10:32:06 PM 694 Views
Wow, you make serious posts on this board. - 02/11/2009 02:04:48 AM 587 Views
Eh, hindsight is 20/20 - 02/11/2009 02:37:46 AM 632 Views
Methinks another channeler (Darkfriend/Black Ajah) placed the Compulsion on Rand's bait. - 02/11/2009 01:44:07 AM 557 Views
Two reasons: The level of Compulsion, and Forsaken paranoia. - 02/11/2009 02:47:57 AM 712 Views
Re: Two reasons: The level of Compulsion, and Forsaken paranoia. - 02/11/2009 02:55:54 AM 540 Views
I think it was Graendal who wove that - 02/11/2009 04:04:02 AM 627 Views
Nope. Balefire doesn't really worry about paradox. - 02/11/2009 02:53:23 AM 582 Views
Re: No. 8 - 01/11/2009 08:56:24 PM 716 Views
Re: No. 8 - 01/11/2009 08:59:12 PM 616 Views
Fingers - 01/11/2009 09:12:51 PM 615 Views
I'm guessing she didn't get them within the first three days *NM* - 01/11/2009 09:18:41 PM 249 Views
One - 01/11/2009 09:41:53 PM 655 Views
I'm 99% sure that was Mesaana. (Sheriam stated specifically that it wasn't Halima) *NM* - 01/11/2009 09:19:09 PM 358 Views
Re: I'm 99% sure that was Mesaana. (Sheriam stated specifically that it wasn't Halima) - 01/11/2009 10:44:07 PM 698 Views
Mesaana has exceptional strength in the Power. *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:01:12 AM 291 Views
As Nynaeve al'Meara and Sharina Melloy. - 02/11/2009 01:47:17 PM 902 Views
Oh yeah...good old gravelly-voiced Cyndane - 02/11/2009 02:06:54 AM 571 Views
Cyndane is the only other option beside Mesaana - 02/11/2009 04:10:27 AM 639 Views
It was clearly Mesaana. - 03/11/2009 07:40:15 AM 598 Views

Reply to Message