Tavi is correct above, that only the actions of those killed by Balefire are removed from the new time sequence. Of course, there's room to prod and push the logic around this to contrive a paradox, and it's better to just let these things be and not think about it too much.
If you were to follow your line of reasoning, then Graendal ceased to exist before Rand actually balefired her, so how could he have balefired her?
If you were to follow your line of reasoning, then Graendal ceased to exist before Rand actually balefired her, so how could he have balefired her?
Continuity errors
- 29/10/2009 04:36:00 PM
2062 Views
Min's bruises
- 29/10/2009 05:37:01 PM
1315 Views
Re: Min's bruises
- 29/10/2009 06:18:13 PM
1310 Views
sorry doesn't work that way
- 30/10/2009 02:30:00 AM
1203 Views
I'd be careful about going down that line of reasoning, though...
- 31/10/2009 09:52:19 PM
1105 Views
You can control how far back the balefire burns.
- 01/11/2009 07:42:29 PM
1100 Views
Rand actually killed Min
- 15/11/2009 07:00:48 PM
1175 Views
No, it's said that she gasps inbetween the letting go of her and the balefire. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 08:27:53 PM
512 Views
This is not a continuity error
- 03/11/2009 01:57:16 AM
1064 Views
Traveling would have required her to know where she was going.
- 15/11/2009 12:39:10 PM
1073 Views
Burn it!
- 30/10/2009 01:56:17 AM
1690 Views
It could be just me, but "for Light's sake" was a new one to me, too...
- 31/10/2009 09:55:17 PM
994 Views

*NM*