Active Users:613 Time:14/10/2025 08:56:02 AM
Nonsense in hindsight. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 03/11/2009 10:51:11 AM
According to Pat of Pat's Fantasy Hotlist. He said in Westeros' Literature forum that tGS was the WoT equivalent of Erikson's Toll the Hounds, in that there was good stuff in the book, but 2/3rds of it concentrated on secondary plot lines.

Given that the book focuses on Egwene and Rand, I wonder what he means. Does he consider Graendal, Aviendha, the BA hunters, Elaida and Siuan to be secondary characters whose stories are unimportant for TG?

Also, apprently, Sanderson cannot do Mat very well.

PS: Posted this separately since this is not a review and does not contain any actual spoilers.
Reply to message
Report: tGS concentrates on Secondary plotlines, it seems. (No Spoilers) - 19/10/2009 03:44:44 PM 1692 Views
Odd. - 19/10/2009 04:06:29 PM 851 Views
I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 04:10:59 PM 816 Views
I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:16:14 PM 765 Views
Re: I'll NB you everything I got from him. I didn't want spoilers, though. - 19/10/2009 04:40:20 PM 746 Views
Done. *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:44:00 PM 319 Views
Thanks! *NM* - 19/10/2009 04:56:58 PM 271 Views
Me too? - 20/10/2009 05:14:43 AM 649 Views
Could you NB me a copy as well? I'm a big no-spoilers kinda guy - 19/10/2009 08:07:19 PM 609 Views
Please send me the review, as well. - 19/10/2009 07:34:00 PM 643 Views
I also like NB messages - 19/10/2009 08:03:21 PM 591 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 19/10/2009 11:25:11 PM 608 Views
Re: I'm waiting for that review... - 20/10/2009 12:19:06 AM 680 Views
Odd - 19/10/2009 06:17:09 PM 796 Views
Please NB me too? - 20/10/2009 07:29:42 PM 673 Views
WHAT!? - 19/10/2009 11:27:52 PM 717 Views
I hope he writes Mat well for fairly obvious reasons *NM* - 20/10/2009 03:47:05 AM 344 Views
Can't do Mat WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!? - 20/10/2009 07:24:24 PM 670 Views
Nonsense in hindsight. *NM* - 03/11/2009 10:51:11 AM 283 Views
Yup. - 03/11/2009 05:34:26 PM 597 Views

Reply to Message