Active Users:292 Time:05/05/2024 02:23:28 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Agreed, with one point Marshall Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM
I don't believe that your level of exhaustion has to do with the actual amount of power you draw. If Rand, without an angreal, channeled at his max for 4 hours straight, he'd be pretty exhausted afterwards. If he used an angreal that doubled his strength, do you think he'd be twice as tired? Doubtful, considering he wasn't dead after using the CK.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1513 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 701 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 755 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 688 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 626 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 660 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 668 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 619 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 643 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 721 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 630 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 806 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 676 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 637 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 783 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 295 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 319 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 694 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 690 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 594 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 575 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 259 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 271 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 615 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 295 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 662 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 780 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 681 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 583 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 640 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 613 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1063 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 651 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 281 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 543 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 972 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 586 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 594 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 609 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 500 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 583 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 539 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 552 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes