Active Users:781 Time:13/05/2026 03:51:42 PM
I could have sprayed TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM
Bad Counterstrike player style.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1870 Views
You should include quotes - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 1045 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1119 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 1018 Views
Sure, I agree... - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 979 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 1006 Views
Please elaborate... - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 984 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 975 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 1000 Views
How generous of you. - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 1076 Views
Scrap that - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 963 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1144 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 1021 Views
I could have sprayed - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 983 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1135 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 456 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 502 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 1091 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 1070 Views
Wrong place *ignore* - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 968 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 918 Views
I do *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 412 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 425 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 957 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 1009 Views
You are missing two important points - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1206 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 950 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1476 Views
Oh, also - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 1002 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 443 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 887 Views
Probably - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1332 Views
Agreed, with one point - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 915 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 965 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 875 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 959 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 875 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 897 Views

Reply to Message