Active Users:1318 Time:29/10/2025 12:52:30 PM
Siuan apologizes for "forcing" Egwene beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 05:53:56 AM
In... LoC, maybe. Possibly CoS? (Wow, that rebel Aes Sedai plot lasted a really long time, in retrospect).

Seancean would be the logical assumption, but Siuan mentions that she had had Egwene "forced" because she needed more people she knew she could trust.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Saidar forcing - 10/11/2009 09:37:53 PM 1150 Views
Re: Saidar forcing - 10/11/2009 10:23:12 PM 812 Views
I see your point - 10/11/2009 11:19:51 PM 772 Views
We know little about forcing, other than a few offhand lines - 11/11/2009 06:56:25 AM 696 Views
I thought I remember one of our main characters being shot up to her potential quickly - 11/11/2009 07:00:54 AM 832 Views
Nynaeve reached her full potential after using the Choedan Kal - she was "forced" by all the Power - 11/11/2009 03:01:33 PM 817 Views
Is that supported by the text? - 11/11/2009 06:37:26 PM 676 Views
Yes; it is mentioned in KOD. *NM* - 11/11/2009 06:56:26 PM 307 Views
Where, specifically? *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:15:23 PM 328 Views
Can't find it...nor my KoD book! It must be in my storage boxes somewhere! - 11/11/2009 10:03:55 PM 680 Views
I searched myself... - 12/11/2009 08:03:49 PM 657 Views
Re: We know little about forcing, other than a few offhand lines - 12/11/2009 06:59:44 PM 699 Views
She was. She just worked really hard heating tea in the White Tower. *NM* - 12/11/2009 07:09:30 PM 303 Views
Siuan apologizes for "forcing" Egwene - 13/11/2009 05:53:56 AM 976 Views
Saidin Forcing - 10/11/2009 11:19:58 PM 778 Views
I don't think so. - 10/11/2009 11:41:22 PM 734 Views
Re: I don't think so. - 11/11/2009 12:42:42 AM 657 Views
I'm not so sure... - 11/11/2009 06:55:56 AM 632 Views
There is nothing wrong with forcing - 11/11/2009 07:27:11 AM 756 Views
Re: There is nothing wrong with forcing - 11/11/2009 04:30:09 PM 710 Views
Re: There is nothing wrong with forcing - 11/11/2009 04:59:35 PM 792 Views
Eh, not sure if I agree - 11/11/2009 11:21:05 PM 658 Views

Reply to Message