The unswearing was basically just an indirect preparation for the possible later betrayal, not already a betrayal itself. The same applies to Verin gathering info on the BA, DF and Forsaken with the intention to possibly betray it to the Lightside some time in the future. The BA Oath just forbids a direct betrayal, IMO.
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
- 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
931 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
720 Views
Yup, totally.
- 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
625 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
671 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
656 Views
Could be in that moment
- 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
575 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
- 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
276 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
- 24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
522 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
662 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
- 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
685 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
- 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
581 Views
*NM*
*NM*
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
- 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
689 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah 
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
587 Views
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
587 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood! 
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
228 Views
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
228 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
- 01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
238 Views
Bigger loophole
- 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
602 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
- 21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
513 Views