That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
Gher Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
Basically, if an Aes Sedai can justify it to themselves, they can do it. Any Aes Sedai could lie, and tell themselves that each single word they say is true. They have as much leeway as they can give themselves.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
2-7-1
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
- 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
988 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
769 Views
Yup, totally.
- 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
676 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
736 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
712 Views
Could be in that moment
- 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
636 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
- 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
302 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
- 24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
576 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
717 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
- 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
740 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
- 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
635 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
- 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
746 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
658 Views
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
658 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood!
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
255 Views
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
255 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
- 01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
297 Views
Bigger loophole
- 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
684 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
- 21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
564 Views

*NM*