However, I cannot see how unswearing the Dark Oath is not a direct betrayal, knowing what the BA Hunters plan to ask, and probably what they would seek to gain from further interrogation (other BA identities, plots, etc.)
It's been a long time since I read that scene, but seems to me they didn't exactly leave her a choice in the matter.
The Hunters crowded her as Talene tried to leave. That was all we saw.
I don't know if Talene resisted physically or with the OP. It probably would have been mentioned instead of being cut short like that if she did.
Interestingly, we find out that Talene escaped in tGS. I assume she is still bound to the First Oath. And also unbound to the DO?!
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
- 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
1022 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
803 Views
Yup, totally.
- 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
714 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
772 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
748 Views
Could be in that moment
- 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
680 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
- 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
320 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
- 24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
613 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
762 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
- 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
777 Views
Yeah
- 19/11/2009 08:12:16 PM
734 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
- 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
674 Views
*NM*
*NM*
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
- 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
785 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah 
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
694 Views
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
694 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood! 
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
268 Views
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
268 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
- 01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
312 Views
Bigger loophole
- 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
749 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
- 21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
592 Views