Active Users:1027 Time:14/09/2026 12:25:42 PM
that's not a good reason kcf Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 08:25:56 PM
She was around in NS... and Mesaana wasn't.


Any AS she's impersonating was also alive in NS and possibly AS already - that's not a good reason.

But there are serveral reasons why it's not:

All hints (most importantly from Verin and Graendal) point to Mesaana being AS

The Mistress of the Kitchens has far too many responsibilities for Mesaana to effectively do anything else.

When I asked Brandon about Laras, the RAFO and following discussion didn't go in the direction of hidden forsaken but of a differnt story altogether that would be revealed in an additional prequel if it gets written.
Need a good book to read? Visit Neth Space - a SFF review and discussion blog.

http://nethspace.blogspot.com/
Reply to message
Mesanna finally! - 20/11/2009 03:33:59 AM 1376 Views
Re: Mesanna finally! - 20/11/2009 12:18:16 PM 895 Views
for purposes of this thead, apparently kfc = me - 20/11/2009 04:30:38 PM 839 Views
Yes... I just thought it was butchered (excuse the pun) quite badly ! - 20/11/2009 04:59:22 PM 798 Views
Hey, that was a good division of labour! - 20/11/2009 06:03:56 PM 837 Views
yes it was! - 20/11/2009 06:05:47 PM 781 Views
Yeah, only recently... - 20/11/2009 06:12:51 PM 804 Views
my apologies: I must have had chicken on the mind - 20/11/2009 09:38:02 PM 786 Views
Eyes - 20/11/2009 03:48:05 PM 908 Views
Mesaana has large, dreamy blue eyes. *NM* - 20/11/2009 05:08:05 PM 395 Views
Re: Eyes - 20/11/2009 05:49:50 PM 938 Views
Norine is described as... - 20/11/2009 05:51:31 PM 940 Views
The first quote somewhat crosses Norine off the list, though. - 20/11/2009 06:03:09 PM 929 Views
And she didn't become Keeper. - 20/11/2009 06:06:34 PM 794 Views
It's possible - my most serious guess are Danelle and Laras at this point, but can add others - 20/11/2009 07:50:55 PM 891 Views
Not Laras - 20/11/2009 08:19:20 PM 833 Views
that's not a good reason - 20/11/2009 08:25:56 PM 915 Views
from Alvairin - 20/11/2009 09:41:53 PM 832 Views

Reply to Message