Active Users:253 Time:07/05/2024 12:05:29 AM
Re: The problem I have with this idea... darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 25/11/2009 09:33:57 PM
Is that it seems too risky and not really advantageous to play several people in the WT, namely an AS, a novice and a servant, for example. I think if Mesaana really mastered to play an AS - and the recent clues strongly point to this - this would be sufficient, considering that AS have the most freedom anyway. No need to play a novice or servant besides that.

And even if for all that Mesaana has indeed several aliases, Norine still seems to be the most likely candidate, even more than Danelle, IMO.


I'm on the fence too ... but there certainly seems times when she would have to disguise herself as other than AS just to move about the Tower with freedom... given the Ajah tensions I have a difficult time seeing her moving around too much without trouble, obscure sister would be just as difficult to deal with as being a Sitter.

I do agree that Norine is a good candidate though, it's hard to say with any certainty if she's a better candidate than Danelle since neither have had a lot of on-screen time but IMO Danelle is the obvious choice which could as likely make her a red herring as the real deal... in short, I haven't a clue who Mesaana really is :)
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Finding Mesaana - 24/11/2009 02:38:10 PM 1457 Views
I think Mesaana is most likely the White Norine Dovarna - 24/11/2009 02:51:19 PM 602 Views
Re: I think Mesaana is most likely the White Norine Dovarna - 24/11/2009 03:08:59 PM 553 Views
Mesaana wields power through Alviarin - 24/11/2009 03:25:45 PM 667 Views
You make an excellent argument - 25/11/2009 06:36:19 PM 447 Views
The problem I have with this idea... - 25/11/2009 07:04:54 PM 471 Views
Re: The problem I have with this idea... - 25/11/2009 09:33:57 PM 444 Views
Why does "Finding Mesaana" sound like a rom-com starring Keanu Reeves? *NM* - 24/11/2009 03:22:25 PM 210 Views
Re: Finding Mesaana - 18/01/2010 07:51:45 AM 522 Views

Reply to Message