Active Users:329 Time:12/07/2025 07:25:09 AM
That assumes Trolloc food in the Blight grows at normal rates. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 26/11/2009 07:12:05 PM
I agree with what's been said. The physical battle will be fought only to give Rand enough time to do what he has to. Given enough time, no amount of intelligent leaders could win the physical battle. The bad guys don't need smart leaders, they have numbers.

While supposedly the bad guys could win, we all know they won't. I agree with Etzel. While we already know the outcome, it's the journey that's rewarded and the how they'll win that I'm looking forward to reading about.


And apparently its only a few hundred thousand. So if the series is realistic, then our estimates of millions of Trollocs is way off.
Reply to message
The Shadow's command structure in the Last Battle... - 26/11/2009 09:30:46 AM 1010 Views
Ummm... - 26/11/2009 09:49:37 AM 572 Views
Re: Ummm... - 26/11/2009 11:21:37 AM 520 Views
To me that's a poor argument. Not you, but rather this viewpoint, which has been raised before... - 26/11/2009 11:55:17 AM 606 Views
+1 - 26/11/2009 02:46:37 PM 600 Views
It is not that simple... - 26/11/2009 07:08:10 PM 525 Views
It doesn't really matter... - 26/11/2009 01:56:05 PM 551 Views
What is the point then? - 26/11/2009 02:05:15 PM 527 Views
Maybe... - 26/11/2009 02:52:39 PM 499 Views
I think you are wrong on the 90% - 26/11/2009 05:51:28 PM 484 Views
Not at all - 26/11/2009 07:23:39 PM 548 Views
But, in the interest of DRAMA, the Shadow's forces would first need to be on the edge of victory... - 26/11/2009 07:29:44 PM 1012 Views
Not they don't - 26/11/2009 07:51:40 PM 1004 Views
Think tLotR - 26/11/2009 03:31:34 PM 607 Views
I agree *NM* - 26/11/2009 04:47:46 PM 200 Views
Some expert on Dragonmount calculated the number of Trollocs that the Blight can support... - 26/11/2009 06:42:17 PM 535 Views
That assumes Trolloc food in the Blight grows at normal rates. - 26/11/2009 07:12:05 PM 505 Views
This is assuming some things... - 27/11/2009 03:04:59 AM 489 Views

Reply to Message