Besides, Forsaken commanding BA is different to BA commanding BA. For one thing, a BA member is unlikely to backstab a Forsaken. This time, I actually agree with Cannoli; most darkfriends will try to climb the ranks by eliminating those above them. Effective BA members would not be let loose by their leaders, because they will probably try to push in on the Supreme Council.
i mean, it would make for tedious reading to include the forsaken micro-managing the BA but i still hold that it's more akin to intimidation than outright controlling them.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Two BA leaders
- 28/11/2009 10:07:00 AM
1055 Views
Actually, she might not have known Verin
- 28/11/2009 11:11:05 AM
663 Views
Well...
- 28/11/2009 11:23:31 AM
606 Views
If the council don't know each other, I doubt Sheriam knew Verin was BA at all (hence the surprise) *NM*
- 28/11/2009 02:54:38 PM
230 Views
Possible, yes
- 28/11/2009 03:05:12 PM
501 Views
Re: Possible, yes
- 28/11/2009 05:29:58 PM
573 Views
Who says the Black Ajah has the same leadership criteria as the Tower?
- 28/11/2009 07:35:32 PM
546 Views
You bring up a good point
- 28/11/2009 09:10:56 PM
543 Views
i'm not so sure
- 28/11/2009 05:35:58 PM
514 Views
Absolutely not.
- 28/11/2009 07:17:43 PM
536 Views
there's a difference between control and intimidation
- 28/11/2009 10:58:03 PM
568 Views
If by "free rein" you mean a Forsaken looking over your shoulder
- 29/11/2009 04:17:56 AM
463 Views
i guess we'll all have to agree to disagree
- 29/11/2009 04:35:40 AM
487 Views
Re: If by "free rein" you mean a Forsaken looking over your shoulder
- 29/11/2009 04:41:03 AM
523 Views