Active Users:483 Time:18/06/2025 09:08:19 AM
Re: Assume there was no Rebellion darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 29/11/2009 06:12:00 AM
Also, Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne would not have been Aes Sedai. This means no Bowl of the Winds, which means the world would have been in severe drought at this time. This also means that there could have been interference with the Cleansing.


Without this event there would probably never have been a Seanchan attack either... no Bowl of the Winds Channeling and the Seanchan would never have thought the AS had a secret weapon.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 19/11/2009 08:07:50 PM 1265 Views
The Pattern "willed" it. - 19/11/2009 08:18:56 PM 615 Views
Well, yeah. I agree with that. *NM* - 19/11/2009 08:22:34 PM 468 Views
I don't really agree. - 19/11/2009 08:22:20 PM 1351 Views
What I'm saying is - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 564 Views
Not really, no. - 19/11/2009 09:02:29 PM 595 Views
Yet - 19/11/2009 08:33:23 PM 532 Views
Re: Yet - 19/11/2009 08:35:37 PM 530 Views
Re: Yet - 29/11/2009 06:56:40 AM 487 Views
I take it that was a reply to BlackAdder... *NM* - 19/11/2009 09:04:32 PM 230 Views
Assume there was no Rebellion - 19/11/2009 10:06:28 PM 599 Views
Right. Even if that does not answer his question. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:11:21 PM 197 Views
Sorry, I forgot to address that... - 19/11/2009 10:20:57 PM 565 Views
Re: Assume there was no Rebellion - 29/11/2009 06:12:00 AM 484 Views
Couldn't be more wrong - delete this evidence-less thread - 21/11/2009 06:36:35 PM 526 Views
OK...? - 21/11/2009 10:16:43 PM 484 Views
You made the assertion, it's not my responsibility to disprove you, - 22/11/2009 04:35:14 PM 494 Views
Re: The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 01/12/2009 01:42:13 AM 656 Views
Re: The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 01/12/2009 01:43:19 AM 524 Views
Wow... - 01/12/2009 11:37:27 PM 514 Views
Egwene could've done most of what she did without screentime. *NM* - 19/12/2009 07:30:14 PM 197 Views

Reply to Message