There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
- 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
932 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
720 Views
Yup, totally.
- 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
625 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
672 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
- 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
656 Views
Could be in that moment
- 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
575 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
- 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
277 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
- 24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
523 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
- 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
663 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
- 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
685 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
- 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
581 Views
*NM*
*NM*
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
- 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
689 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah 
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
587 Views
Just kidding.
- 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
587 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood! 
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
228 Views
*NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
228 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
- 01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
239 Views
Bigger loophole
- 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
603 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
- 21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
513 Views