Active Users:185 Time:19/05/2024 03:21:20 AM
She said"much" influence. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 07/12/2009 02:50:35 AM

That Sarene or the other AS don't have much influence on Elaida, especially in the current situation. And there is no sensible way that Semirhage's cooperation would make the AS more able to persuade Elaida to lessen Semirhage's punishments, since Elaida doesn't know about it at all.

The Oath is really a joke, if it allows such false statements to deceive someone else.


I agree that the oaths are a joke. It is not a matter of whether one speaks the truth, but of whether it is perceived as the truth. Perhaps, when Sarene left the Tower, she felt that Elaida could still be influenced. She has been gone long enough not to know the state of affairs at present. To think that members of the embassy might have some (even if it is tiny) influence over the Amyrlin who sent them does not have to be a lie. I think the oath against lying has been abused sufficiently on screen that I find it believable that she could say this and not be BA. Clearly, it is a load of crap, but she isn't the first AS to say something that falls into that category.
Reply to message
Sarene's statement - 06/12/2009 02:44:35 PM 984 Views
Re: Sarene's statement - 06/12/2009 03:21:18 PM 587 Views
No... - 06/12/2009 03:28:03 PM 563 Views
Sure enough - 06/12/2009 03:50:09 PM 526 Views
I think it's obvious - 06/12/2009 04:30:28 PM 558 Views
while I don't disagree that the Oaths are a joke... - 06/12/2009 05:54:45 PM 448 Views
Re: I think it's obvious - 06/12/2009 06:25:53 PM 435 Views
She said"much" influence. - 07/12/2009 02:50:35 AM 379 Views
Perhaps the fact that... - 07/12/2009 10:23:48 PM 343 Views
Perhaps She Thinks Being Part of Elaida's Embassy Was an Honor. - 06/12/2009 05:14:11 PM 431 Views
Possibly she felt that Semirhage was so evil that the idea of lying to her was moot. - 06/12/2009 06:44:19 PM 414 Views
That's Shashalle *NM* - 06/12/2009 06:52:12 PM 183 Views
Remember, she is a White. - 07/12/2009 04:31:47 AM 409 Views

Reply to Message