personally i'm not disagreeing with you exactly. i definitely believe that ultimately your potential is your gateway size. just can't remember anybody's growing.
If they do grow i think it'd be in increments of gateway opening. Rand made six Deathgates at a time. I theorized that if he was making as many as many as possible, which the circumstances suggest, then his total power must be divisible by seven. Six thresholds. Seven fits in with the old twenty-one levels statement too.
If that's true then every time a channeler passed a gateway strength level threshold their gateway size would increase to the next closest level to their final potential. Say your potential was 43 you would be able to open a 29 gateway as soon as you had the 14 strength necessary to open one. and once you were stronger than 29 you'd be able to open the 43 size your potential suggested.
If they do grow i think it'd be in increments of gateway opening. Rand made six Deathgates at a time. I theorized that if he was making as many as many as possible, which the circumstances suggest, then his total power must be divisible by seven. Six thresholds. Seven fits in with the old twenty-one levels statement too.
If that's true then every time a channeler passed a gateway strength level threshold their gateway size would increase to the next closest level to their final potential. Say your potential was 43 you would be able to open a 29 gateway as soon as you had the 14 strength necessary to open one. and once you were stronger than 29 you'd be able to open the 43 size your potential suggested.
Gateway size and One Power strength - a theoretical model...
- 15/12/2009 08:42:26 AM
792 Views
There's this....
- 15/12/2009 09:58:26 AM
441 Views
Rand's later quotes confirm, but also refute this. Also, Egwene throws a wrench in things.....
- 15/12/2009 04:02:33 PM
443 Views
who's gateway size have we seen increase?
- 15/12/2009 12:06:58 PM
406 Views
Nice points, I wonder...
- 15/12/2009 12:16:22 PM
353 Views
Angreal or sa'angreal do not increase your gateway size...
- 15/12/2009 12:21:10 PM
361 Views
I can't remember Asmo's comment.
- 15/12/2009 12:23:46 PM
448 Views
Light in the Night quotes it above...
- 15/12/2009 12:27:42 PM
296 Views
Unfortunately
- 15/12/2009 12:37:21 PM
327 Views
I'm pretty sure that Rand makes the maximum possible gateway for one person...
- 15/12/2009 12:41:48 PM
315 Views
Re: I'm pretty sure that Rand makes the maximum possible gateway for one person...
- 15/12/2009 01:44:46 PM
409 Views
Well they might
- 15/12/2009 01:42:24 PM
338 Views
How big was Cadsuane's gateway?
- 15/12/2009 01:43:20 PM
430 Views
Re: How big was Cadsuane's gateway?
- 15/12/2009 02:00:58 PM
336 Views
So 8 or 9 feet, I'd say...Edited to add another possibility.
- 15/12/2009 02:05:48 PM
308 Views
Re: So 8 or 9 feet, I'd say...
- 15/12/2009 02:09:06 PM
370 Views
I came up with another possibility after first replying to this issue...
- 15/12/2009 02:11:41 PM
347 Views
Re: I came up with another possibility after first replying to this issue...
- 15/12/2009 02:16:23 PM
327 Views
and in the TGS Siuan uses Vora's sa'angreal
- 15/12/2009 04:56:34 PM
350 Views
I agree w/ you. Siuan and Vora's sa'angreal refutes one of the points in the original post *NM*
- 15/12/2009 05:08:23 PM
172 Views
Another theory
- 15/12/2009 05:26:45 PM
338 Views
Excellent points
- 15/12/2009 06:08:09 PM
321 Views
Yes, pretty much
- 15/12/2009 01:41:34 PM
327 Views