Active Users:336 Time:17/06/2025 04:11:27 PM
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
Perhaps the distribution would be more Gaussian (bell-shaped) when you consider the whole possible population of channelers rather than just the AS. This is purely speculative, but since in the AoL every possible channeler was found and trained to potential, then perhaps the strength distribution would have been perfectly Gaussian in the AoL.


In the Age of Legends the average woman might have been half as strong as Lanfear, with a perfectly Bell shaped curve, but that doesn't apply to modern channelers.

This entire debate centers around how modern channelers stack up against Forsaken class channelers. And the evidence in the books clearly show that the average Aes Sedai isn't close to 50% as strong as the strongest woman.

Heck, the average Aes Sedai is shown to be less than 50% as strong as Egwene.

So I am perfectly happy to accept a perfect Bell Curve in the Age of Legends. But that wouldn't apply to modern channelers.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1457 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 845 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 916 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 430 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 780 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 837 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 925 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 874 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 1000 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 832 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 783 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 899 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 970 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 760 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 926 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 948 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 841 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 806 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 825 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 793 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 916 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 813 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 794 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 800 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 892 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 781 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 787 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 847 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 803 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1038 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 745 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 824 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 798 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 818 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 808 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 798 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 888 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 774 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 458 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1102 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 820 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 398 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 779 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 752 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 955 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 446 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 756 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 911 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1111 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 792 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 1010 Views

Reply to Message