Cadsuane tells us that when she was younger, there were more women of her strength level, but by NS, they'd begun to die off (or were killed). She says that there are a few women who are close to her in the "modern" generation, but they are few and the women below them are much more common.
This points to the general decline of the strength of Aes Sedai in the White Tower. We know that channelers are not growing weaker in general, but the Tower is for some reason.
I think that the culling theory makes sense, but not from the angle the Aes Sedai are thinking of it. They claim removing men from the gene pool has caused the decline in strength. I think, rather, that by removing a significant portion of the channeling women from the same areas generation after generation, and not adding to the subsequent generations by reproducing, the Aes Sedai have weakened the pool of potential candidates.
This is not to say that I agree that the curve should be set at 50%... I just wanted to point out a mechanism that the Tower is using that reduces the strength of their sisters in general.
This points to the general decline of the strength of Aes Sedai in the White Tower. We know that channelers are not growing weaker in general, but the Tower is for some reason.
I think that the culling theory makes sense, but not from the angle the Aes Sedai are thinking of it. They claim removing men from the gene pool has caused the decline in strength. I think, rather, that by removing a significant portion of the channeling women from the same areas generation after generation, and not adding to the subsequent generations by reproducing, the Aes Sedai have weakened the pool of potential candidates.
This is not to say that I agree that the curve should be set at 50%... I just wanted to point out a mechanism that the Tower is using that reduces the strength of their sisters in general.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength
- 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM
1755 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided
- 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM
1050 Views
The Curve only refers to the channeling population, not to non-channelers.
- 18/12/2009 01:56:25 PM
1040 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed.
- 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM
1130 Views
It doesn't matter...
- 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM
975 Views
But, it sort of does.
- 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM
1043 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength?
- 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM
1199 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle...
- 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM
1180 Views
Two things...
- 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM
1066 Views
The culling theory...
- 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM
986 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai...
- 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM
1104 Views
Several more things...
- 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM
1143 Views
You don't understand your own model...
- 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM
1170 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution?
- 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM
1028 Views
So, Aviendha trumps RJ? A woman who, as late as tGS, doesn't know what she's doing with the OP?
- 19/12/2009 06:12:42 PM
1002 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias
- 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM
1005 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear...
- 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
1104 Views
Partially agreed...
- 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM
1006 Views
Well, the Aes Sedai are the only group that we have detailed strength info about...
- 18/12/2009 10:26:48 PM
1153 Views
Sharina is AS ... she'd be dead in a few years if she hadn't gone to the Tower *NM*
- 28/12/2009 01:08:20 AM
989 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion...
- 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM
989 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker?
- 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM
969 Views
Easier sulution, and real example.
- 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM
1066 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with...
- 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM
1007 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with...
- 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM
1255 Views
Dude, Seriously?
- 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM
1004 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that...
- 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM
1043 Views
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing?
- 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
1021 Views
- 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
1021 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution.
- 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM
1010 Views
I'm sorry, but I've never heard of a non-Gaussian bell curve. Can you prove its existence? *NM*
- 20/12/2009 03:24:22 AM
537 Views
Maybe people in my field just use the term in a non-technical way. We do things with ...
- 21/12/2009 07:24:43 PM
959 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM*
- 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM
552 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre
- 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM
951 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread
- 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM
942 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve:
- 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM
1123 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"?
- 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM
1325 Views

