Active Users:1188 Time:26/09/2026 08:34:53 AM
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
Perhaps the distribution would be more Gaussian (bell-shaped) when you consider the whole possible population of channelers rather than just the AS. This is purely speculative, but since in the AoL every possible channeler was found and trained to potential, then perhaps the strength distribution would have been perfectly Gaussian in the AoL.


In the Age of Legends the average woman might have been half as strong as Lanfear, with a perfectly Bell shaped curve, but that doesn't apply to modern channelers.

This entire debate centers around how modern channelers stack up against Forsaken class channelers. And the evidence in the books clearly show that the average Aes Sedai isn't close to 50% as strong as the strongest woman.

Heck, the average Aes Sedai is shown to be less than 50% as strong as Egwene.

So I am perfectly happy to accept a perfect Bell Curve in the Age of Legends. But that wouldn't apply to modern channelers.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1860 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 1128 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 1233 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 588 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 1057 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 1136 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 1298 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 1183 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 1268 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 1159 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 1076 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 1214 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 1293 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 1056 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 1240 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 1263 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 1101 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 1103 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 1159 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 1084 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 1189 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 1093 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 1081 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 1091 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 1195 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 1059 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 1059 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 1145 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 1082 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1328 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 1027 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 1110 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 1068 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 1087 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 1133 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 1103 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 1166 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 1057 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 605 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1369 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 1107 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 548 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 1073 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 1034 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 1327 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 588 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 1014 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 1221 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1405 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 1104 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 1307 Views

Reply to Message