Active Users:521 Time:31/10/2026 06:04:22 AM
If sa'angreal were massproduced, it is a wonder that the world wasn't destroyed during the WoP, IMO ursidae Send a noteboard - 22/12/2009 10:26:47 PM
I actually think the only sensible angreal that we have seen in this series was Graendal's ring - the others are a little corny.

"Let's mass produce some angreal! Oh, and they'll all be in the shape of...a fat man sitting in the lotus position!"

"Oh, let's make a few that look like crystal swords!"

"Anything that doesn't look basic or is easy to hide is approved by our quality control fashionistas!"

"I want to make one in the shape of a ring."

Dead silence...


Since the Forsaken were the top of the foodchain on the side of the Shadow, I reckon they commandeered the most powerful sa'angreal for themselves.

So I reckon Demandred probably had a staff almost as powerful as Callandor, while Sammael had a gauntlet amplifying his strength by 50, Rahvin had a ring giving him 20 times his normal strength etc.

If these things were being mass produced, surely the Forsaken had the most powerful devices available for their personal use.
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1887 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 1273 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 1421 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1723 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 610 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 567 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 1115 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 562 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 1102 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 1247 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 1127 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 1143 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 594 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 1422 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 1225 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 1491 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 1156 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 1218 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 1092 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 1066 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 1140 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:04:17 PM 1160 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 1129 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 558 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 1085 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 1148 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 1200 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 1076 Views
If sa'angreal were massproduced, it is a wonder that the world wasn't destroyed during the WoP, IMO - 22/12/2009 10:26:47 PM 1327 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 1055 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 1133 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 1105 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 1294 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 1097 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 1050 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 1182 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 1213 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 1060 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 1184 Views

Reply to Message