Active Users:401 Time:16/05/2024 09:30:18 PM
It could well fly Mysteria Indictus Send a noteboard - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM
Lanfear was a OP researcher, Mesaana was an instructor, and Demandred is second only to LTT, surely one of them has the knowledge, or at least enough to figure it out.


Lanfear was an OP researcher, true, but I always assumed that the sa'angreal technology - possibly unlike that of the ter'angreal - had been around for a while and that any angreal or sa'angreal the researchers might need in their work could have been manufactured by other Aes Sedai specialized in that area.

Mesaana was an instructor, true, but that does not mean she had to know everything about the OP. Think about university teachers of today. Just because you know everything about linguistics or history doesn't mean that you have to know squat about math. And Mesaana wanted to do research, which could mean that her area of expertise was closer to that of Lanfear, which if so did not include *angreal making.

Demandred was second only to Lews Therin, sure, but what would that prove? Can a vice president - as I said above - always build a space shuttle?

And by the way, Aginor and Balthamel were also academics. Only their areas we know (almost) for sure had nothing to do with *angreal making.
//Mysteria Indictus
Previously known as NightShade
Gleeman of the Page of Legends
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1373 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 727 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 855 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1054 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 359 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 322 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 568 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 305 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 589 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 683 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 585 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 574 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 333 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 822 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 645 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 893 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 620 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 720 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 580 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 565 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 609 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 564 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 298 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 594 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 590 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 656 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 552 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 519 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 591 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 582 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 699 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 585 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 548 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 577 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 660 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 520 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 633 Views

Reply to Message