Active Users:1012 Time:03/05/2026 05:18:26 PM
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM* amirebram Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
Reply to message
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS - 23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM 1871 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes - 23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM 1260 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable - 23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM 1214 Views
I dont know if it's my first favorite or second favorite *NM* - 23/12/2009 04:07:53 PM 507 Views
tGS is IMHO easily one of the top 5 books in the series. *NM* - 23/12/2009 04:28:34 PM 613 Views
No, tGS was a pile of crap. *NM* - 23/12/2009 02:52:40 PM 536 Views
There were parts that clearly needed some help... - 23/12/2009 05:23:22 PM 1172 Views
Pretty good given the circumstances. I'm grateful. - 23/12/2009 06:49:46 PM 1291 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample - 23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM 1147 Views
Boo hoo hoo. *NM* - 24/12/2009 02:19:28 AM 498 Views
They could have just not finished the series. - 24/12/2009 06:16:49 AM 1210 Views
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM* - 25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM 513 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM 466 Views
Re: Can't bring myself to re-read tGS - 27/12/2009 09:00:53 PM 1037 Views
Wow. I thought it was a LOT better than some previous books. - 27/12/2009 11:02:13 PM 1126 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing - 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM 944 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good. - 30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM 998 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM* - 30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM 508 Views
It's kind of sad - 31/12/2009 03:25:03 AM 1036 Views
Re: Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good. - 17/01/2010 10:49:29 PM 1125 Views
I couldn't disagree more. - 17/01/2010 11:06:52 PM 1031 Views
Not alone! - 19/01/2010 05:41:03 AM 991 Views

Reply to Message