Brandon Sanderson is not Robert Jordan. Those who are disgruntled seem to fail to realize that no matter how hard one tries, there are going to be differences.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS
- 23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM
1520 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes
- 23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM
891 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable
- 23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM
819 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM
510 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM
747 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM
844 Views
*NM*
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM*
- 25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM
335 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
284 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing
- 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
563 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good.
- 30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM
596 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM*
- 30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM
322 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style
- 14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM
580 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore
- 14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM
647 Views