Active Users:500 Time:19/12/2025 03:14:43 PM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1177 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 540 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 649 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 727 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 636 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 615 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 472 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 563 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 592 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 512 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 540 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 526 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 530 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 522 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 613 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 580 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 549 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 527 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 490 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 487 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 513 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 232 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 549 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 512 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 522 Views

Reply to Message