Active Users:555 Time:04/03/2026 11:22:13 PM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1210 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 568 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 693 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 758 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 674 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 647 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 499 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 597 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 626 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 549 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 581 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 555 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 554 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 553 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 649 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 608 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 585 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 560 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 513 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 511 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 544 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 238 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 585 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 542 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 550 Views

Reply to Message