Active Users:326 Time:04/07/2025 12:06:51 PM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1121 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 483 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 577 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 674 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 578 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 546 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 425 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 517 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 535 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 452 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 480 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 470 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 480 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 462 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 546 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 508 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 490 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 471 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 420 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 432 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 462 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 206 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 486 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 454 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 463 Views

Reply to Message