Active Users:630 Time:23/12/2025 05:52:38 AM
It had to be a circle of six men and six women... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 16/01/2010 03:18:16 AM
The BwB says explicitly that a circle of six men and six women, being the most balanced possible circle between men and women, was capable of doing some things no other circle could.

We're even told that a circle of 72 at times was weaker than a circle of 12, especially if it was not balanced well.

I assume that the precision advantage any mixed circle gives depends on the balance of the link. A circle of one man and one woman is quite capable of some things that two men and one woman or vice versa cannot do.

So, it seems that LTT did need just six women, and they had to be very strong.

Why not weaker women with angreal/sa'angreal? I think the circle leader had to shift through the operation, and then, one of the weaker women would be called upon to weave stuff, and due to lower dexterity and skill, they would have mucked it up.

Hence, he was left with no choice but to go for it with only men.
Reply to message
LTT and the bore. - 16/01/2010 02:50:34 AM 1523 Views
I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 02:57:13 AM 811 Views
Re: I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 03:23:14 AM 825 Views
I always thought the scene with Cadsuane an empty threat... - 16/01/2010 12:28:17 PM 749 Views
It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:18:16 AM 772 Views
there is no such thing as a circle of 6 and 6 - 16/01/2010 03:35:17 AM 680 Views
Re: It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:37:49 AM 777 Views
Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 06:02:49 AM 810 Views
Re: Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 04:00:11 PM 714 Views
Dude, you seem to not read what is written... - 16/01/2010 07:28:27 PM 722 Views
Hmm... - 18/01/2010 11:21:41 AM 652 Views
I think... - 16/01/2010 11:31:18 AM 811 Views
Re: I think... - 16/01/2010 01:27:40 PM 776 Views
In my view... - 16/01/2010 01:50:03 PM 611 Views
Re: In my view... - 16/01/2010 02:11:20 PM 617 Views
We know... - 16/01/2010 02:43:41 PM 733 Views
Its presented as fact - 16/01/2010 03:00:33 PM 620 Views
Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:10:28 PM 669 Views
Re: Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:26:13 PM 693 Views
In my opinion - 16/01/2010 03:51:02 PM 592 Views
RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 16/01/2010 04:31:02 PM 614 Views
Re: RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 18/01/2010 06:09:40 AM 571 Views
RJ could be tricky, true... - 19/01/2010 02:56:05 PM 598 Views
RJ changed his mind about a lot of stuff throughout the series - 22/01/2010 06:35:09 PM 623 Views
Re: We know... - 16/01/2010 03:17:54 PM 673 Views
It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:27:49 PM 584 Views
Re: It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:44:33 PM 686 Views
I don't think - 16/01/2010 03:56:25 PM 635 Views
The question is how many people were still alive? - 18/01/2010 06:19:49 AM 665 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 19/01/2010 02:47:58 PM 242 Views
Did you read my second post? *NM* - 16/01/2010 03:42:23 PM 361 Views
My Thoughts - 16/01/2010 09:43:33 PM 606 Views
The women needed to balance the men - 18/01/2010 12:12:27 PM 694 Views
What if Rand usesTP to off the DO? - 22/01/2010 05:54:13 PM 601 Views

Reply to Message