Plus I think channelling through a gateway (eg to create cuendillar) is impossible. Even if you had someone creating it on each side, the two halves would not join.
That said, I see no advantage between this and simply tying of the weave, even if it worked.
That said, I see no advantage between this and simply tying of the weave, even if it worked.
Cuendillar can pass through a gateway, as far as we know. It can't be cut by a gateway, it is pushed out of the way. If someone opened up a gateway, and the shoved a cuendillar doorframe inside of it in such a way that it was unable to close because the doorway keeps it open, then those doorways could be placed in rooms and other places. Tying it off would probably work as well, although the advantage of the doorway is if you brushed up against the edge, you wouldn't get cut.
You can channel through a gateway. After leaving the Kin's Farm in PoD (I think) after the Bowl of the Winds, Avi throws fireballs through the gateway at attacking Seanchan.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
2-7-1
Cuendillar and Perpetual Gateways
- 14/01/2010 03:32:15 PM
1678 Views
I'm still not sure if cuendillar would be "destroyed" or "remain"
- 14/01/2010 03:55:00 PM
871 Views
Quick question ...
- 15/01/2010 01:34:21 AM
869 Views
No - cuendillar just gets stronger the more powerful a force you use against it
- 15/01/2010 07:55:34 PM
789 Views
Cuendillar shields
- 14/01/2010 04:57:45 PM
876 Views
Wasn't the consensus...
- 14/01/2010 05:04:50 PM
868 Views
Really?
- 14/01/2010 05:30:40 PM
774 Views
Re: Really?
- 14/01/2010 05:52:45 PM
727 Views
Even so...
- 14/01/2010 06:30:35 PM
804 Views
Not sure, but the discussion might be saved somewhere (maybe in my e-mail somehow)
- 14/01/2010 07:12:42 PM
931 Views
Lack of Creativity / Flame
- 14/01/2010 07:31:32 PM
883 Views
*shrug* You can look for the original discussion if you like. Desc of seal is in Book VI, P 80
- 14/01/2010 08:48:13 PM
822 Views
Re: *shrug* You can look for the original discussion if you like. Desc of seal is in Book VI, P 80
- 14/01/2010 09:23:36 PM
822 Views
Re: *shrug* You can look for the original discussion if you like. Desc of seal is in Book VI, P 80
- 14/01/2010 09:36:26 PM
761 Views
let's do some quick math to see how feasible this is...
- 15/01/2010 12:16:02 AM
692 Views
Again, Lack of Creativity
- 15/01/2010 12:54:01 AM
720 Views
right cause they are full of new ideas in WoT!
- 15/01/2010 12:57:52 AM
681 Views
Huh? Are you saying that...
- 15/01/2010 01:49:23 AM
731 Views
It's not just a matter of creativity
- 15/01/2010 03:42:38 AM
802 Views
Are you trying to be funny? 
- 15/01/2010 09:22:18 AM
777 Views
- 15/01/2010 09:22:18 AM
777 Views
I think what people are saying to you (at least what I am saying)
- 15/01/2010 07:58:31 PM
880 Views
The vast majority of WoT folk aren't particularly innovative
- 15/01/2010 08:02:52 PM
695 Views
Pretty much. I think their religion is not doing anything helpful with the Power.
- 15/01/2010 09:13:49 PM
667 Views
Mail is obviously out of the question...
- 15/01/2010 12:54:32 AM
776 Views
Create a ter'angreal that can open gateways wherever it is pointed and triggered.
- 14/01/2010 04:59:28 PM
719 Views
Maybe this was one of the violent games played for sport during The Collapse *NM*
- 14/01/2010 05:14:05 PM
334 Views
*NM*
Or they could just tie the gateway weave off, like Sammael did in CoS, and Rand did in KoD...
- 14/01/2010 07:11:56 PM
909 Views
Thanks; I thought this was the case but couldnt recall the sections.
- 14/01/2010 07:13:32 PM
679 Views
True... I forgot...
- 14/01/2010 07:18:25 PM
779 Views
Tied-off weaves dont last forever
- 14/01/2010 07:39:53 PM
713 Views
Why would this mean that the gateway weave doesn't need to be maintained? *NM*
- 17/01/2010 03:22:58 PM
324 Views
Because even if it wasn't tied off, it'd get stuck around the cuendillar doorway, unable to close. *NM*
- 22/01/2010 09:07:34 PM
323 Views
But RJ said that cuendillar could not pass into a gateway, didn't he?
- 23/01/2010 11:53:35 AM
657 Views
I'm not exactly sure what you mean...
- 24/01/2010 09:47:20 PM
739 Views