I really believe that this would have been the ideal thing to do. There will probably be a compromise of some sorts in the next two books, but to cripple the Seanchan would have made sense and been my action if I was Rand.
Very true. Rand originally intended to destroy the palace and the ships with balefire, then rain fire on the whole city causing panic and mass death. He chose not to go through with his attack, because the people in Ebou Dar showed him compassion when he got sick. He was unable to hurt them.
My question would be, why the heck was he planning on attacking the city itself in the first place? How does that make any sense? I mean all he would have had to do is wipe out the leadership and major military installations. There was never any need for him to hurt a single non-combatant.
He could have taken out only Tuon, disrupting the Seanchan leadership. Destroyed all the ships which would have freed the Sea Folk to ferry food freely and quickly. And struck major and decisive blows to the army itself, demonstrating the ability to crush the Seanchan and forcing them back to the negotiation table.
I never understood why attacking the mostly civilian capital was even an option. Another sign of Rand being crazy lunatic at that point I guess.
Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne?
- 16/02/2010 07:03:12 PM
2294 Views
I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
- 16/02/2010 08:24:20 PM
1309 Views
So you think him submitting to the Seanchan is a good thing?
- 17/02/2010 07:25:13 PM
1303 Views
It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 17/02/2010 11:03:22 PM
1142 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 17/02/2010 11:41:11 PM
1049 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 18/02/2010 03:23:39 AM
1018 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 18/02/2010 03:38:04 AM
1108 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 19/02/2010 03:18:35 PM
1172 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
- 18/02/2010 07:18:44 AM
1047 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
- 18/02/2010 01:22:49 PM
1047 Views
Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
- 18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM
1040 Views
- 18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM
1040 Views
As I said - all of Randland's political systems have strengths and weaknesses.
- 18/02/2010 05:46:40 PM
923 Views
I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
- 19/02/2010 03:23:22 PM
1062 Views
Re: I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
- 19/02/2010 06:13:08 PM
987 Views
Re: I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
- 19/02/2010 07:37:25 PM
1101 Views
the entire system of Seekers isn't an abuse of power? Bethamin winds up fleeing due to her fear of
- 20/02/2010 12:13:52 AM
1100 Views
No, they're the only group that seems to pay more than lip service to the concept of responsibility
- 20/02/2010 03:37:58 PM
1009 Views
You asked for an example of abuse of power. The Seekers are a clear abuse no better than any
- 20/02/2010 04:42:06 PM
1373 Views
Thanks for the perspective of outsiders and the behavior of a Darkfriend. THAT's good info!
- 24/02/2010 01:26:39 PM
1282 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
- 19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM
954 Views
- 19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM
954 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
- 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM
1178 Views
- 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM
1178 Views
