Active Users:564 Time:29/06/2026 07:33:27 AM
Unswear VS Still Nargs Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM
When an Aes Sedai is stilled or burned out they immediately lose the ageless look. However, when they are loosed of the oaths with the oath rod they retain their ageless look.

I suspect, though, the ageless look would disappear or wear off slowly over time.
Reply to message
so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 23/03/2010 04:45:00 PM 1772 Views
Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute *NM* - 23/03/2010 05:40:32 PM 481 Views
Unswear VS Still - 23/03/2010 11:31:18 PM 1086 Views
Re: Doubt it. They were unbound for less than a minute - 24/03/2010 04:53:23 AM 949 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 03:08:21 AM 978 Views
Re: so egwene had almost all the aes sedai loose and reswear the oaths - 24/03/2010 12:32:05 PM 903 Views
I had a related question about the oath rod: - 24/03/2010 10:07:52 AM 1437 Views
Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 12:04:53 PM 1105 Views
Re: Non-channelers cannot use oath rod - 24/03/2010 03:26:43 PM 1419 Views
Too bad she didn't take the opportunity to drop the Oaths altogether. - 25/03/2010 02:14:32 PM 967 Views
Unthinkable - 25/03/2010 03:35:56 PM 947 Views
Agreed - 25/03/2010 07:30:46 PM 1002 Views
Re: Agreed - 26/03/2010 04:51:18 PM 929 Views
yup - 27/03/2010 09:04:30 PM 848 Views
I disagree. The Oaths are among the least irritating of the many irritating things about Aes Sedai. - 27/03/2010 09:56:34 PM 892 Views
I'm with ya Templar. They have ways around everything. *NM* - 29/03/2010 06:07:00 AM 426 Views
Except when they're leashed to an a'dam *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:28:05 AM 396 Views
I would have loved it if Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne went off and started their own organizations - 02/04/2010 06:04:30 PM 1067 Views
well they're not the daughters of silence thats for sure - 11/04/2010 07:13:42 PM 928 Views
maybe a slight redo. - 11/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 836 Views
i thought - 31/03/2010 01:02:19 AM 864 Views

Reply to Message